Malicious Intent of Mr G in Providing "Evidence" to a SGS Top Leader (Part 2 of 3)

G 先生向 SGS 最高领导人提供“证据”的恶意（第 2 部分，共 3 部分）

This 2nd of the first series of 3 article seems to be on the source of the alleged "evidence" that SGS top leaders have against this study group, which they have labeled a faction. Mr G, an MD member, gave and twisted these to a certain top leader, who is more than happy to use it as revenge for a personal grudge more than 10 years ago. Mr G acted with malice to exact revenge on his ex-wife, Ms J, who had requested a divorce after being subjected to an abusive marriage.

本网站的编辑一直在关注 SGS 的最新发展，并阅读 hossakukempon.com 发布的文章。我们想在这里重新转发。第一个系列的 3 篇文章似乎是关于壮年 G 提供了扭曲的资料以便让某位SGS高级干部复仇。这些资料正好让高级干部用来对付一个自行学习的小组。据说，G 是因为想对他的前妻J 报复而恶意行事。
​

[The following are extracted from www.hosshakukempon.com]

​Hello everyone, this is the 2nd part of the mail and please be warned that the triggering of a flurry of emotions may occur after reading.  HK Editorial Team finds it heart wrenching ourselves.  This is part 2 of 3.

---

Continue from part 1...

(2) Attacking on kids

Mr G also subjected Ms J to much mental torment through his treatment towards her two daughters. The two school-going daughters had to go through an unbelievable level of emotional upheaval as a result of his behaviour. Mr G was expecting the trip to Taiwan in December to be a couple's getaway and was very upset when Ms J wanted to bring both kids along. He displayed his annoyance throughout the entire trip, walking way in front of them all the time. One night during the trip, he even called the younger daughter “a monster, just like your father” when she threw a tantrum. This made the already sobbing girl cry more ferociously.

Mr G’s emotions were as erratic as the weather. Whenever he was on good terms with Ms J, he would be kind to the girls, let them use his laptop and sit on his lap or even snap selfies with them and share on social media. However, on days or weeks when he decided to stonewall Ms J, he would ignore the girls’ greetings or treat them coldly if they approached him. There were occasions where he even told them not to call him “Daddy” but “Uncle G” instead, saying “I am not your daddy”. His inconsistent behaviour confused the girls as they could not comprehend it at their young age.

Another incident involved Mr G locking Ms J out of the master bedroom following a quarrel. In the middle of the night, he tossed a pillow forcefully at Ms J's face after seeing her sleeping calmly in the daughters' room together with her two daughters on their mattress. He then kicked the mattress on which they were all sleeping and insisted on "talking things out", forbidding Ms J to go back to sleep. 

Both children felt apprehensive as a result of Mr G's merciless, senseless aggression against Ms J, but they also grew protective of their mother. During another conflict, in which Mr G threatened in front of the girls to chase Ms J out of the house the very night, the girls asked their mother if she had enough money to move house. One could sense the enormous weight these two little children had to bear from their innocent question as they so desperately wanted to keep their mother safe. Though Ms J never bad-mouth Mr G in front of the girls, both asked her mum more than once, “Why do you have to marry Daddy?”

(3) Self-Centred and Lack of Empathy

The couple shifted back to stay with Ms J’s mum whose cancer is in its final stage. As Ms J’s mum continued to weaken, Ms J had to sleep with her in case of emergency and to attend to her toileting needs. Instead of supporting the already physically exhausted Ms J, Mr G took issue with Ms J not sleeping with him and requested the couple spend some nights at their own house. Ms J was hesitant as no one else could assist her mum. Mr G was not only unable to empathize, but blamed Ms J for not attending to his needs. He accused her of placing him last priority below her mum and daughters.

During such times, Ms J would frequently initiate lengthy conversations that left her feeling exhausted. Mr G would never stop rationalizing and insinuating that the issue was Ms J's, and she would always end up taking the blame. Mr G prevented deeper conversation from taking place by refusing to be emotionally open, and the root of the issues were frequently not addressed.

​To be continued...

---

电邮的内容第二部：

(2) 拿孩子出气 
 
G会拿孩子(J与前夫 的2个女儿）出气来精神折磨J。 可怜的女儿们需要同时面在学校的压力及受G的精神对待。在一次的全家难得的旅游，G甚至称发脾气的小女儿为“魔鬼”（就像你爸爸一样），反而造成女儿哭得不可收拾。 

变化无常的G，但他跟J无事时，就会跟孩子们嬉笑。当他想要对付J时，就会对J的孩子们冷淡！G 甚至跟他们说我不是你们的爸爸，叫我 “ G叔叔”！这样的无常表现，让年幼的孩子无法捉摸他的举动。 

回想起，G曾把J所在房外。半夜，当他看到无奈的J正与孩子共享一张床，他气到将枕头狠狠地扔向J的脸庞。他踢了床褥一脚，把J叫醒小吵一番，总之就是不让她安心睡就对了！ 

孩子们都因G的无情，无头绪的G的家暴感到忧虑。有一晚，G又恐吓要把J逐出家，孩子们都会问妈妈是否有钱借宿在外？ 可见孩子们都时时刻刻活在家暴之中，虽然J从未在孩子面前说过G的坏话，她们还会问妈妈为什么要嫁给这样的爸爸? 

(3) 自我为中心及欠同理心

那时，由于J的母亲患了末期癌症，所以JG俩夫妇都帮会J娘家住。G就借此大作文章说J无法照料他的需求。他感受不到身心已疲惫的J需要照料母亲和女儿们，也同时需要工作。他完全不能体会J为什么每晚定要在母亲的房间服侍母亲。 

当时，J会常与G对话沟通，但这些对话都无济于事，因为G常会找些理由解释自个的怪行为，而且是J最后得要背负这些责任。G也从未真正的敞开心扉，坦诚与J一起解决问题的根源。 

(未完待续)